Liste-149

 

 

ELECTRICAL SPINAL CORD STIMULATION FOR REFLEX SYMPATHETIC DYSTROPHY

 

M. Kemler, G. Barendse*, F. v.d. Wildenberg and M. van Kleef*. Maastricht University Hospital, Departments of Surgery and Anesthesiology*, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

 

Purpose: To retrospectively assess the clinical efficacy and possible adverse effects of electrical spinal cord stimulation (ESCS) in the treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD).

 

Methods: All studied patients suffered severe pain due to RSD. The diagnosis RSD (Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, type 1) was based on the criteria of the International Association for the Study of Pain. All patients had previously been treated by physical therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and syrmpathetic blockages, without lasting success. The ESCS‑system was implanted only after a positive one week test period.

 

From all patients the pain was rated prior to placement (by means of Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), one month after placement, and at the end of follow‑up. Besides, patients were asked to score their RSD situation at the end of follow‑up, as compared to before start of the treatment on a seven‑point scale, indicating: best ever, much improved, improved, not unproved/not worse, worse, much worse, worst ever.

 

Results: Of 23 patients, treated between 1991 and 1997, 18 reported improvement during the test‑period (78%). The others noted no effect (2 cases) or more pain (3 cases). Permanent placement was not performed in these patients. The mean painscore of 18 patients one month following placement of the ESCS‑system was 4.2 (range: 1 7). With three patients the system was removed 8 to 20 months following placement, because of no effect (2 cases) and an infected lead wound (1 case). At the end of follow‑up (mean: 32; range: 6‑79 months) 15 patients still had an implanted system. Their mean painscore had decreased from 7.9 to 5.4 (p<0.001). For the other 8 patients the painscore had not changed significantly. Thirteen patients with an ESCS‑system scored much improved or improved as a global perceived effect and were regarded successful (57%).

 

Conclusion: In this retrospective series, the majority of RSD patients report a subjective improvement by ESCS. To confirm these findings, a prospective randomized trial is undertaken.