Improvement of functional ability by electrical stimulation in persons after trans femoral amputation


Burger H1, Marinček Č1

1Rehabilitation Institute of Slovenia

University of Ljubljana

helena.burger@ir-rs.si

Valenčič V2

2Faculty of Electrical Engineering

Slovenia


 


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to find out if electrical stimulation of the great gluteal muscle can improve the control of unlocked prosthetic knee and functional abilities of persons after trans femoral amputation.

32 males after trans femoral amputation who came to the first rehabilitation were divided into two groups of 16 persons, a group with electrical stimulation (ES group) and a control group.

All subjects participated in the standard rehabilitation program. The gluteus maximus muscle on the amputated side of subjects of the ES group was electrically stimulated.

Before discharge the ability to control unlocked prosthetic knees, walking time, need of additional support and ability to climb stairs have been evaluated.

More subjects from stimulated group were able to control unlocked prosthetic knee and climb stairs. They were also able to walk longer with less additional.

1.       Introduction

In spite of lightweight and energy efficient prosthetic limb systems that have made prosthetic limb fitting and walking possible for an expanded number of patients with amputation 15, Nissen 14 reported impairment with ambulating in the community of  most persons after lower limb amputation.

After a trans-femoral amputation the morphology of the muscles around the hip joint at the amputated side altered 8, 9. The muscles on the amputated side become weaker 8, 9. The changes are in correlation with the stump length. Already Harris in 19444 stressed the importance of well functioning stump for prosthetic fitting. For stability and control of unlocked prosthetic knee in persons after trans-femoral amputation the hip extensors, specially the great gluteal muscle, which remains the only uncut hip extensor,  is important.

The strength and the endurance of skeletal muscles can be improved by exercises and also by electrical stimulation 2, 3, 18, 19, 21, 22. Kondrashin 12 and Roganov 17 stimulated many stump muscles at rest and during walking. They reported that they improved strength and also gait of the patients.

The aim of the present study was to strengthen the great gluteal muscle in order to improve the control of unlocked prosthetic knee and functional ability of persons after trans femoral amputation.

2.       Subjects and methods

32 males after trans femoral amputation who came to the first rehabilitation and did not walk with a prosthesis before, were divided into two groups of 16 persons, a group with electrical stimulation (ES group) and a control group. There was no difference between the two groups in age (The mean age of stimulated group was 59.5 (SD 9.4) years and of control group 58.5 (SD 11.6) years), cause of amputation, condition of the stump, walking distance, climbing stairs and need of support. Persons also had no other disease that can influence the rehabilitation outcome or limit the prescription of the prosthesis as stroke, heart disease, paresis, paralysis,...

All subjects participated in the standard rehabilitation program. The great gluteal muscle on the amputated side of subjects of the ES group was electrically stimulated 3 weeks 1 hour per day.

Before discharge have been evaluated the ability to control unlocked prosthetic knee, daily walking time, need of additional support while walking 10 meters and ability to climb 10 stairs up and down.

3. Results

All persons got a prosthesis with a quadrilateral socket. Six persons of ES group and three from control group controlled unlocked prosthetic knee and also got it. Others were not able to control an unlocked knee and got a prosthesis with a locked knee (p < .05).

Persons from the ES group walked significantly more before discharge than persons from the control group (c2 = 11.9, p <.01).

Persons from the ES group also need significantly less additional support while walking than persons from the control group (c2 = 5.4, p < .05).

All persons from the ES group were able to climb stairs. Five persons of the control group were not able to climb stairs at discharge.

4. Discussion

One of the main goals in rehabilitation after lower limb amputation is successful ambulation 16. A preliminary condition for ambulation after trans femoral amputation is successful control of the above-knee prosthesis. For good prosthetic control a person needs strong muscles of the stump and good range of movement 7, 5. With electrical stimulation of the great gluteal muscle on the amputated side the muscle becomes stronger1 and persons better control unlocked prosthetic knee.

Walking distance, additional support and ability to climb stairs are all important for independence in daily activities such as shopping, visiting friends, relatives and public places. To short walking distance may led to social isolation and dependence on other people.

A person after lower limb amputation must be able to walk 600 steps a day to manage independently in a one-level house or apartment and 1100 - 1450 steps a day to live independently in a one- or two- level dwelling6. These daily minimums do not include activities outside the home such as shopping. We have not counted the steps but the walking time of ES group was longer what means that they are able to make more steps.

Additional support impedes several daily activities, specially if person needs two crutches.  They have troubles with carrying things like glasses, plates, books, when shopping, with cleaning and cooking. Persons of ES group need less additional support and because of this they are more independent.

Many persons do not have stairs at home but in Slovenia are still many public places and institutions with stairs and there persons who can not climb them have problems.

Siriwardena 20 and Narag 13 reported that with aging persons have more disabilities, Kihn 11, Katrak 10 and Pohjolainen 16 that many persons some years after the amputation do not use their prosthesis any more. Because of this we believe that the rehabilitation outcome and functional ability after the first rehabilitation are very important. The better they are the better is persons starting position and he or she may be longer independent. With electrical stimulation of the great gluteal muscle on the amputated side of persons after trans-femoral amputation we can effectively improve the functional abilities of these persons.

5. Conclusion

Electrical stimulation of the great gluteal muscle improves hip extension of persons after trans femoral amputation and their functional abilities. Because of this it is a good additional therapeutic technique in rehabilitation of persons after trans femoral amputation.

 

References

1          Burger H. Električna stimulacija ekstenzorjev kolka pri bolnikih z nadkolensko amputacijo. Disertacija. Ljubljana: IR-RS, 1995.

2          Delitto A, Snyder-Mackler L. Two theories of muscle strength augmentation using percutaneus electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 1990;70:158-64.

3          De Lorme TL. Restoration of muscle power by heavy-resistance exercises. J Bone Joint Surg 1945:27A:645-667.

4          Harris RL. Amputations. J Bone Joint Surg 1944;29:741-5.

5          Hill-Watson S, Sheredos SJ. Report on the evaluation of the DAV/Seattle knee. J Rehabil Res Dev 1994;31:62-9.

6          Holden JM, Fernie GR. Extent of artificial limb use following rehabilitation. J Orthop Res 1987;5:562-8.

7          Inman VT, Ralston HJ, Todd F. Human walking. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1981.

8          Jaegers SMHJ. The morphology and functions of the muscles around the hip joint after a unilateral trans-femoral amputation. Leiden: Otto Bock 1993:3-15, 73-112.

9          James  U. Maximal isometric muscle strength in healthy active male unilateral above - knee amputees, with special regard to the hip joint. Scand J Rehabil Med 1973;5:55-66.

10         Katrak PH, Baggott JB. Rehabilitation of elderly lower - extremity amputees. Med J Aust 1980;1:651-3.

11         Kihn RB, Warren R, Beebe GW. The "geriatric" amputee. Ann Surg 1972;176:305-14.

12         Kondrashin NI, Viteson AS, Skoblin AA. Electrostimulation of muscles during the gait with an above-knee prosthesis in primary prosthetics. In: Popović DB. Advances in external control of human extremities X. Beograd: Nauka 1990; 425-33.

13         Narag IC, Mathur BP, Singh P, Jape VS. Functional capabilities of lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1984;8:43-51.

14         Nissen SJ, Newman WP. Factors influencing reintegration to normal living after amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:548-51.

15         Pinzur MS, Littooy F, Daniels J, Arney C, Reddy N, Graham G, Osterman H. Multidisciplinary preoperative assessment and late function in divascular amputees. Clin Orthop Res 1992:239-43.

16         Pohjolainen T, Alasranta H, Karkkainen M. Prosthetic use and functional and social outcome following major lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990;14:75-9.

17         Roganov VA, Feldman OE, Spivak BG. Portable corrector of movements. In: Popović DB. Advances in external control of human extremities X. Beograd: Nauka, 1990;469-72.

18         Selkowitz DM. Improvement in isometric strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle after training with electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 1985;65:186-96.

19         Selkowitz DM. High frequency electrical stimulation in muscle strengthening. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:103-11.

20         Siriwardena GJA, Bertrand TRCS, Bertrand PV. Factors influencing rehabilitation of arteriosclerotic lower limb amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev 1991;28:35-44.

21         Stefanovska A, Vodovnik L. Change in muscle force following electrical stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med 1985;17:141-6.

22         Vossius G, Nanassy A, Frech R, Müller S. Application of electrical stimulation to clinical rehabilitation. In: Popovič DB. Proceedings of 13th inter. symp. on external control of human extremities X. Beograd: Nauka, 1990:205-12.