Control of Heart Rate with Vagus Nerve Stimulation

H.P.J. Buschman1, C.J. Storm2, D.J. Duncker3, P.D. Verdouw3, P. van der Kemp4, H.E. van der Aa1,5

1Twente Institute for Neuromodulation (TWIN), Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede,

2Department of Cardiology, Medisch Centrum Rijnmond-Zuid, Rotterdam,

3Experimental Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, Rotterdam,

4Foundation for Aviation Medicine Research, Oegstgeest,

5Department of Neurosurgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands,

 


Abstract

   Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve can change heart rate in animals and humans. We investigated if a clinical implantable lead system that is used in chronic cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment of epilepsy can be used for control of the heart rate.

Experiments were carried out in three pigs under general anaesthesia. The right and left vagus nerves in the neck region were exposed by dissection, and bipolar multiturn, helical leads were wrapped round the vagus nerves. Stimulation was applied by an external device with multi variable settings. Measurements were performed under normal sinus rhythm and during isoprenaline induced tachycardia.

VNS under optimal pacing conditions increased RR-intervals by ~40%, irrespective of the duration of the RR-interval preceding NVS. The effect on heart rate was established within 5 seconds after the onset of stimulation and was reversible.

We conclude that a helical lead for nerve stimulation can be used effectively to decrease heart rate. Fully implantable vagus nerve stimulation devices may be used for nonpharmacological treatment of illnesses in which tachycardia result in deterioration of cardiac function.

 

1.       Introduction

   Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve (VNS) has been shown to influence heart rate in animals and humans [1-4]. In animals reductions in heart rate vary from 20% to 80 % [1]. In humans few studies have investigated cardiac effects as a result of stimulation of parasympathetic nerves [2-4].

In this study we investigated the use of a commercially available helical coiled lead for vagus nerve stimulation to control heart rate [5]. In addition we determined the optimal stimulus characteristics, and investigated whether left, right and left + right vagus nerve stimulation gave similar results.

 

2.       Methods

2.1.       Animal Care

All experiments were performed in accordance with the Guiding Principles for Research Involving Animals and Human Beings as approved by Council of the American Physiological Society and under the regulations of the Animal Care Committee of the Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

 

2.2.       Surgical Procedure

After an overnight fast, crossbred Landrace ´ Yorkshire pigs of either sex (weight 21 to 26 kg, n = 3) were sedated with ketamine (20 to 25 mg/kg IM), anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (20 mg/kg IV), intubated, and connected to a respirator for intermittent positive pressure ventilation with a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen. Respiratory rate and tidal volume were set to keep arterial blood gases within the normal range.

Catheters were positioned in the superior caval vein for the continuous administration of sodium pentobarbital (10 to 15 mg × kg-1 × h-1) and saline. In the descending aorta, a fluid-filled catheter was placed to monitor aortic blood pressure. Through a carotid artery, a manometer-tipped catheter (B. Braun Medical BV) was inserted into the left ventricle for measurement of pressure.

After the administration of pancuronium bromide (4 mg) the left and right cervical vagus nerves were dissected free in a similar way as described for electrode placement for vagus nerve stimulation electrode placement in patients with refractory epilepsy [6]. At least 4 cm of the nerve was completely freed from its surrounding tissues. Depending on the size of the exposed nerves, either 2 mm or 3 mm diameter helical electrodes (NeuroCybernetic electrode model 300, Cyberonics, Inc., TX, USA) were wrapped around the nerve trunks. This lead is a bipolar, multi-turn silicone helix with a platinum band on the inner turn of one helix. During the experiment the wound was kept moist using physiological saline.

 

2.3.       Experimental Protocol

After a 10-minute stabilization period, baseline heart rate measurements were obtained. Then, following a protocol the left and right vagus nerves were randomly stimulated. Stimulation was applied with an EMG Electronic Stimulator (model SEM-4201, Nihon-Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). Stimulation parameters were: stimulation frequency 10-100 Hz; pulse duration 100-700 ms; delay after R-top 0-0.5 msec; stimulation current 0.5-14 mA.

Measurements were performed both at cardiac rest rates (100-120 min-1) and at increased rates (200-220 min-1) during isoprenaline infusion (2 mg/min).

2.4.       Data analysis

Data were recorded using a digital ECG storage system and analyzed using LabVIEW (Development System Version 4.0.1, National Instruments Corporation, Austin, Texas, USA).

 

3.       Results

Cardiac rates at rest periods (baseline rates) with and without isoprenaline infusion in repeated experiments were respectively 120 ± 4 min-1 (N=7) and 202 ± 6 min-1 (N=7). After stopping the infusion of isoprenaline the heart rate decreased to control rates within 30 minutes.

VNS under optimal conditions (100 Hz, 5 mA, 0.2 msec, 70 msec delay) in an ECG-triggered pacing mode increased RR-intervals by more than 40 %.

 

Figure 1. Effect of stimulation on RR-interval. Top Effect at baseline rates. Bottom Effect at isoprenaline-infusion increased rates. Solid circles: left vagus nerve stimulation; open circles: right vagus nerve stimulation. Experimental conditions: 30 Hz, 0.5 msec, pulse delay 70 msec. The RR-interval was averaged over 5-7 heart beats.

 

Figure 1 shows the effect of stimulation current on the RR-interval for both left- and right-sided vagus nerve stimulation at near optimum stimulation conditions. The upper graph shows the results for vagus nerve stimulation at normal cardiac rates, and the lower graph for rates increased as a result of isoprenaline infusion. The RR-interval is represented as the fraction of the control value without vagal nerve stimulation. These graphs illustrate that the RR-interval increases almost linearly with increasing stimulation current, and percentage-wise the effects are similar during basal heart rate and during isoprenaline-induced tachycardia, i.e. no statistically significant differences were found between the effects on RR-interval observed at normal rates and the RR-interval at high rates. The absolute effect of vagus nerve stimulation on RR-interval at normal rates (not shown), however, was statistically significant lower than the effect at isoprenaline-induced increased rates for all applied stimulation currents. In the lower graph from visual inspection it seems that the maximum effect (about 35 % increase in RR-interval) is reached at a stimulation current of about 3 mA, after which the effect stabilizes. Furthermore, the lower graph shows that stimulation of the left and right vagus nerves have similar slowing effects on heart rate. The maximum vagus nerve stimulation induced effect on RR-interval is reached within 5 seconds (5 ± 2; mean ± SD), and is the same for left + right-sided stimulation. Blood pressure and left ventricular pressure remained unchanged during VNS.

 

4.       Summary and Conclusions

In this study we have carried out experiments to determine the effect of cervical electrical vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate of pigs using an implantable multiturn helical lead [5]. We looked at effects on heart rate when the vagus nerve including the cardiac branches were stimulated, and identified the optimal stimulation parameters for control of heart rate. Our results show that the heart rate can be reduced significantly (> 40%). This was achieved at electrical stimulation energies that are similar to those used in VNS for treatment of epilepsy [7]. Moreover, our results indicate that the effect of VNS on heart rate is rapid and can be administered to control heart rate on specific moments in time.

Although most VNS research for control of heart rate has been performed in animal studies the consistency of the results obtained in preliminary human studies suggests that this technique may be used in human. This potentially opens up the possibility to implant a device which, in contrast to a cardiac pacemaker, lowers the heart rate, and may be particularly beneficial for terminating specific paroxysmal arrhythmia or the nonpharmacological treatment of chronic heart failure [8].

We conclude that stimulation of the vagus nerve with a commercially available NVS-electrode for chronic treatment of epilepsy can effectively lower the heart rate in pigs both during basal heart rate and pharmacological induced tachycardia. Further studies are needed to determine whether this technique is effective in humans where chronic intermittent lowering of sinus rate is desirable.

 

References

[1]     Armour JA, Randall WC, Sinha S. Localized myocardial response to stimulation of small cardiac branches of the vagus. Am J Physiol 1975;228:141-8.

[2]     Thompson GW, Levett JM, Miller SM, et al. Bradycardia induced by intravascular versus direct stimulation of the vagus nerve. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:637-642.

[3]     Asconape JJ, Moore DD, Zipes DP, et al. Bradycardia and asystole with the use of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy: a rare complication of intraoperative device testing. Epilepsia 1999;40:1452-1454.

[4]     Schimmel LJJC, Buschman HPJ, Hageman G, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative bradycardia with the use of vagus nerve stimulation [Abstract]. Epilepsia 2000;41(5 Suppl): 43S

[5]     Brent Tarver W, et al. Clinical experience with a helical bipolar stimulating lead. PACE 1992;15:1545-1556

[6]     Reid SA. Surgical technique for implantation of the neurocybernetic prosthesis. Epilepsia 1990;31:S38-39

[7]     Rutecki P. Anatomical, physiological, and theoretical basis for the antiepileptic effects of vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsia 1990;31(Suppl 2):S1-6

[8]     Morillo CA, Klein GJ, Thakur RK, et al. Mechanism of ‘inappropriate’ sinus tachycardia: role of sympathovagal balance. Circulation 1994;90:873-877