Selective
Small Fiber Activation by Anodal Blocking
Obtained
With a Step Pulse
A. Vuckovic1, N.J.M. Rijkhoff1, D. Stefania2
The aim of this study is to investigate the use of a step pulse to obtain selective small fiber activation by anodal blocking. The charge of a step pulse is less compared to the conventional rectangular pulse and would be therefore safer in a chronic application. Acute experiments on pigs show that using a step pulse, charge reduction up to 13 % can be achieved.
Electrical stimulation of nervous tissue using implanted electrodes can be used to induce muscle contraction in neurologically impaired individuals. With conventional stimulation, large diameter nerve fibers are recruited before smaller ones [2]. However, some applications in urology, gastroenterology and skeletal muscle activation require selective activation of small fibers without activating larger ones [3, 5].
Experiments in humans [4] have shown that it is possible to obtain selective stimulation of small fibers using the method of anodal blocking. The principle of selective small fiber activation by anodal blocking is that both small and large fibers are activated and that the propagation of action potentials (AP) in the large fibers is blocked distal to the activation site. To obtain anodal blocking a tripolar cuff electrode is most commonly used. The central contact is the cathode and the lateral contacts are anodes. The fibers are excited close to the cathode and the AP’s of large fibers are blocked close to the anodes.
A drawback of this technique is that it requires relative long pulses (between 300 and 600 ms) and relative high current (1 mA). These currents may cause neural damage and electrode contact corrosion because the charge per

pulse is high [1]. To make the technique safer for chronic use, the charge per pulse should be reduced. Computer simulations have shown that the charge per pulse can be reduced if a square pulse is modified with a step pulse of the same duration (Fig. 1) [6]. The idea is based on the fact that an AP needs time to propagate from the cathode to the anodes. Therefore, at the beginning on the pulse it is not necessary to apply the high current, which is needed to obtain blocking.
The aim of this study was to validate the theoretical results in acute animal experiments.
Acute
experiments were performed on 6 nonspinalized female Danish Landrace pigs,
weighting about 40 kg. Anesthesia was induced by Isoflurane (1 ml/10 kg). The
animals were intubated and breathed with the aid of a ventilator (40% O2
and 60% N2O). Saline was administered intravenously.
A
dorsal laminectomy was performed from the vertebral level L4 to S3 and the dura
was opened to the entire length of the laminectomy to expose the sacral roots.
Individual nerve roots were identified by their size and by responses of
several muscle groups to stimulation with bipolar hook electrode. Ventral and
dorsal roots were separated and the cuff was placed around the ventral part.The
dura was filled with saline to prevent roots from drying. The wound was closed
to keep the roots at the body temperature of 37 oC.
The split cylinder cuff electrode with three contacts was
placed around the nerve. Separation between contacts was 3 mm, contact width
was 0.5 mm and the length of a whole cuff was about 1 mm. The stimulator
consisted of two synchronized current sources with a common cathode. Anal
sphincter pressure was measured with a catheter with the filled balloon. Rectal
pressure was measured with the catheter with an open tip. The water was infused
through the rectal catheter 5 ml/h to prevent blocking of the catheter. For
displaying and recording rectum pressure and pressure in the anal canal a
BioBench (National Instruments) program was used. Stimulation was preformed
with a pulse train 25 Hz, 2 s. Wire electrodes were placed in the anal
sphincter for recording the EMG. EMG
recordings were obtained from single
pulses, averaged on 5 pulses. The EMG was amplified 10000 times and displayed
on a portable oscilloscope (Fluke) and transmitted to an on-line PC for
displaying and recording.
The
blocking current Ibl was first determined for a square pulse
of 600 ms. This was the lowest current by which the
rectum, innervated by small nerve fibers was activated, and the anal sphincter,
innervated by large nerve fibers was not activated. The pulse duration was than
decreased until an incomplete block developed, i.e. until anal pressure started to increase. In that
way, the minimum pulse duration t for a minimum blocking current Ibl
was determined. A step pulse of the duration t was then applied. The
duration of the first step was increased from 0 ms in steps of 20 ms. The amplitude of the first step was given three
predefined values 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 times Ibl. For each
combination of t1 and I1, the amplitude of
the second step I2 on which blocking was achieved was
determined. All currents are expressed as cathodal currents, which are a sum of anodal currents.
3. Results
Rectal
and anal pressure responses to intradural stimulation of S2 left sacral root,
recorded from one pig are shown in Fig. 2. Total pulse duration was t=350
ms and the blocking current was Ibl=1.16
mA. For I1=0.25 Ibl it was possible to
obtain blocking with I2=Ibl up to t1=60
ms. During partial block with t1=80
ms, the amplitude of anal pressure was 50
% of the amplitude during activation with a square pulse of duration 100 ms. Rectal pressure remained unchanged
during all stimulations. Fig. 3 shows
the EMG responses to stimulation with a step pulse of a total duration 350 ms.
Fig. 2. Rectal pressure (a) and anal
pressure (b). Vertical bars denote start of stimulation. A minimum current I2 was 1.15 m. Stimulation was always performed
with pulses t= 350 ms, with a pulse train 25 Hz, 2s. Duration
of the first step is given under the anal pressure responses. Amplitude of the
first step was 0.25 Ibl. Last pressure response, marked by an arrow was
obtained with a square pulse of the duration of 100 ms, where no blocking occurs.
Fig. 3. EMG response of
external anal sphincter for stimulation with step pulses, with t=350 ms. Last EMG for square pulse with t= 100 ms. Vertical bars denote start of
stimulation. Stimulation currents was I2=1.15 mA
The duration of the first step was varied and the amplitude
was fixed to I1=0.25 Ibl.
The EMG response to stimulation
Fig. 4.
Amplitude of the second step I2 as a function of a duration
of the first step t1, for three different current values of the
first step: I1=0.25 Ibl; 0.5 Ibl; 0.75 Ibl. Ibl=1.15 mA;
t=350ms.
with the square
pulse of duration t= 100 ms is also
shown.
Fig 4. shows relation between I2
and t1 for three different values of I1.
Maximum t1 for minimum I2 is obtained for I1=0.75
I2. Fig. 5. shows the relation between the charge per pulse Q and t1. Minimum charge per pulse was obtained for I1=0.25
I2 and t1=60 ms. This charge is 13 % less than a charge induced with the
square pulse of the same duration.
![]()
Fig. 5.
Charge per pulse with the step pulse as a function of a duration of the
first step t1, for three different currents of the first step: I1=0.25
Ibl; 0.5 Ibl; 0.75 Ibl. Ibl=1.15
mA; t=350ms. The charge induced with the square pulse of the same duration
and blocking current is 402 nC.
In
the other five pigs, the minimum pulse duration to obtain a complete block varied
from 350 to 500 ms. Minimum Q was achieved for t1 from
60 to 80 ms for different I1.
Mean value of a charge reduction was 8.12±3.19 %
compared to the square pulse.
4. Discussion
Selective small fibers activation by anodal blocking may
cause a neural damage in a long-term use, due to the high charge per pulse.
Experiments on pigs have shown that this charge can be reduced by changing the
pulse shape from a square to a step pulse
The applied step pulse may have the same blocking
current as the square pulse. The reduction of the charge depends on the
duration and the amplitude of the first step.
This
work was supported by Danish Technical Research
Council.
[1] W.F. Agnew, D.B. McCreery, L.A. Bullara,
T.G.H. Yuen, “Effects of prolonged electrical stimulation of peripheral nerve”,
in Neural prostheses, fundamental studies, W.F. Agnew, D.B. McCreery Eds. New
Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp. 147-169, 1990.
[2] J.T. Mortimer, “Electrical excitation of
nerve”, in Neural prostheses, fundamental studies, W.F. Agnew, D.B. McCreery
Eds. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp. 67-85, 1990.
[3] E. Henneman, “Recruitment of motoneurons:
the size principle”, Prog. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 9, pp. 26-60, 1981.
[4] N.J.M. Rijkhoff, H. Wijkstra, P.E.V. van
Kerrebroeck, F.M.J. Debryne, “Selective detrusor activation by electrical
sacral nerve root stimulation in spiral cord injury”, J. Urol., vol. 16,
pp.337-341, 1998.
[5] P.E.V. Van Kerrebroeck, F.M.J. Debruyne,
”World wide experience with the
Finetech-Brindley Sacral Anterior Root Stimulator”, Neurology and Urodynamics,
Vol. 12, pp. 497-503, 1993.
[6] A. Vuckovic, N.J.M. Rijkhoff, “A new
pulse shape to obtain selective small fiber activation by anodal blocking”,
Proc. 23rd Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE-EBMS, Istanbul, Turkey, 25-28 Oct. 2001.