A method of automated conditional neuromodulation of neurogenic detrusor overactivity using a combined sacral anterior and posterior nerve root stimulator implant in patients with spinal cord injury.
1
Institute of Urology and Nephrology, The Royal Free and
2 Spinal Research Centre, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 4LP.
3 Department
of Medical Physics & Bioengineering,
Email: j.bycroft@ucl.ac.uk
Website: spinalresearchcentre.org.uk
Abstract
Spinal cord injury results in severe dysfunction of the lower urinary tract. This leads to incontinence and ultimately renal failure (if untreated). One method of suppressing neurogenic detrusor overactivity is neuromodulation applied to pudendal afferent nerves, typically at the level of the dorsal penile nerve. Direct stimulation (either electrical or magnetic) of posterior sacral nerve roots is also capable of effecting neuromodulation. We studied five patients with combined sacral posterior and anterior nerve root stimulators, and utilised an automated system of conditional neuromodulation of neurogenic detrusor activity. Automated conditional neuromodulation using posterior nerve roots resulted in a reproducible suppression of detrusor overactivity. This study paves the way for the development of permanently implantable neuroprosthetic devices to restore and maintain function in the neuropathic bladder.
1 1 Introduction
1.1 Sequelae of spinal cord injury
Suprasacral spinal cord injury frequently results in neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). This is due to the development of aberrant spinal reflexes. In addition patients will usually demonstrate detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). Combined, NDO and DSD result in reflex incontinence and high intravesical pressures. Ultimately this may lead to pathological changes within the bladder and vesico-ureteric reflux, and in due course deterioration of the renal system. Anticholinergic medication is frequently combined with intermittent catheterisation to overcome these problems and to increase bladder capacity, however these drugs frequently result in debilitating side effects, such as dry mouth and constipation.
1.2 Neuromodulation and spinal cord injury
Neuromodulation (NM) via
dorsal penile nerve stimulation is well established as a method of
experimentally suppressing NDO and improving bladder capacity [1]. We have
previously described the SPARSI (Sacral Anterior & Posterior Nerve Root
Stimulator), that potentially allows for combined NM (via posterior root stimulation) and emptying on demand (via anterior nerve root stimulation) [2][3]. In addition, SPARSI obviates the need for posterior rhizotomy. Traditionally posterior rhizotomy
was performed alongside the SARSI (sacral anterior root stimulator) to increase
bladder capacity and to prevent reflex incontinence. However posterior rhizotomy is a permanent neuro-destructive
process, and leads to loss of reflex erections and ejaculation in males, as
well as loss in residual sensation.
1.3 Aims of study
We aimed to test a system of closed-loop automated conditional neuromodulation via implanted SPARSI in five patients.
2 Methods
2.1 Patients
Five male patients with existing SPARSI implants were selected. All drugs modulating the lower urinary tract were stopped 5 days prior to testing. Standard filling cystometry (at 30 ml/min) was performed, under both control and test conditions.
2.2
Cystometry and neuromodulation
Patients were placed in a sitting position, in order to replicate normal wheelchair positions.
Software was devised whereby an waveform generator was triggered for 1 minute when Pdet reached a pressure of 10 cmH20. Rectangular pulses of 200 ųsec were utilised; frequency of stimulation was 15Hz. Amplitude was set at three times that required to produce a pudendo-anal reflex, which was at levels much lower than that required to produce a detrusor contraction. Combined S3,4 nerve roots were stimulated to effect neuromodulation. The fill was terminated when a sustained Pdet >35 cmH20 was reached, or voiding occurred.
The equipment configuration is demonstrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1 a

Figure 1 b
Figure
1: Equipment configuration and mechanism of action
(opposite)
The overall equipment layout is shown in Figure 1a.
Automated posterior nerve root stimulation occurs above a pre-programmed rise
in detrusor pressure (10 cmH20), leading
to suppression of NDO.
Figure
1b demonstrates the mechanism of action of neuromodulation
using this configuration. Posterior nerve roots are conditionally stimulated
via the standard Finetech-Brindley interface, and NDO
is suppressed.
3 Results
All patients demonstrated integrity of posterior nerve roots, via preservation of reflex erections, bulbocavernosal reflexes, ankle jerks and NDO. Automated implant-driven conditional neuromodulation was able to suppress NDO in all patients, resulting in an increased bladder capacity.
The triggering of the automated system by rises in detrusor pressures reliably suppressed contractions, as can be demonstrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Automated conditional neuromodulation
The
neuromodulation commences as the detrusor
pressure passes the threshold for stimulation. This continues for 1 minute. Detrusor suppression is seen to occur (NM arrows).
Eventually leakage occurs due to neuromodulation
‘breakthrough’.
4
Discussion and Conclusions
4.1 Discussion of results
These tests are the first to describe the potential for automated control of NDO via a chronically-placed permanent device. In addition, there has been no evidence of permanent neural injury. Whilst the equipment arrangement would not be suitable for the testing in the patients’ own home environment, we are currently devising a compact system to replicate the function of the experimental arrangement in more ‘ambulatory’ circumstances.
The ideal permanent device would be capable of detecting the onset of NDO, ideally by recording signals from the sacral posterior nerve roots emanating from the bladder; this would be the trigger for conditional stimulation [4]. The same device would also be required to empty the bladder via anterior root stimulation.
Our tests obviously require the patient to be catheterised in order to detect the onset of contractions. They do however serve to clearly demonstrate that automated closed loop neuromodulation is possible with chronically-implanted electrodes.
4.2 Concluding remarks

This is the first demonstration of automated closed loop neuromodulation via a permanently implanted device in humans with spinal cord injury. Whilst not necessarily demonstrating a currently feasible modality of management, it provides a great deal of information regarding the specification and capabilities of future devices.
[1]
Kirkham AP,
[2] Craggs M, Casey A, Shah PJR, Creasey G, Kirkham A, Khastgir J, Knight S. SPARSI- An implant to empty the bladder and control continence without posterior rhizotomy in spinal cord injury. BJU Int 85 Supp.5: 2. 2000.
[3] Kirkham AP, Knight SL, Craggs MD, Casey AT, Shah PJR. Neuromodulation through sacral nerve roots 2 to 4 with a Finetech-Brindley sacral posterior and anterior root stimulator. Spinal Cord 40(6):272-281. 2002.
[4] Jezernik S, Grill WM, Sinkjaer T. Detection and inhibition of hyperreflexia-like bladder contractions in the cat by sacral nerve root recording and electrical stimulation. Neurourol Urodyn 20(2):215-230. 2001.
This work has been supported by a European Commission grant as part of the organisation ‘Restoration of Bladder Function by Neuroprosthetics (REBEC)’ (QLG5-CT-2001-00822).