INTERSEGMENTAL MODULATION BY
PERIPHERAL AFFERENTS IS MODIFIED IN HEMIPARESIS FOLLOWING STROKE
Dyer JO1, 2, 3, *,
1Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en
réadaptation, Université de Montréal, Canada
2Institut de réadaptation de Montréal,
Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
3École de réadaptation, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Québec, Canada
* Presenting author: Dyer JO. Email address: jomerdy@gmail.com
Intersegmental pathways linking quadriceps (Quads) to soleus (Sol) were
explored in 11 stroke subjects and compared to those of 14 healthy controls.
Relationships between changes in these circuits and motor impairment were also
assessed.
Subjects
were seated and the effects of the conditioning stimulation of femoral nerve
(FN) over the voluntary isometric contraction of Sol at 20% and 40% of maximal
EMG were measured. FN stimulation produced a short-lasting (26 ± 1 ms) and
brief (8 ± 2ms) facilitation (25 ± 44%) of Sol EMG, in 40% of controls. In
stroke subjects, this facilitation had a similar latency and duration but was
observed in a greater proportion of patients (64%) and with an increased
amplitude (111 ± 99 %). This abnormal facilitation was correlated to spasticity
(r=0.88; p<0.001). In all control subjects, the facilitation was followed
(34 ± 4 ms after FN stimulation) by an inhibition (decrease of 48 ± 22%) of Sol
EMG, for a duration of 59 ± 34 ms. In contrast, hemiparetic subjects did not
show on average the FN-induced inhibition of Sol EMG.
It is argued that the malfunction of
intersegmental circuits could contribute to the motor impairment observed at
the paretic lower limb.
Spinal
pathways are thought to assist muscular coordination at the lower limb, in
human bipedal stance and gait (Meunier et al., 1994). Several basic
sensorimotor mechanisms are involved in the regulation of motoneurones
excitability at one medullar segment. The malfunction of these segmental
mechanisms is well documented in hemiparesis following a strok
Althought the impairment of segmental pathways is well established
in hemiparesis, few studies have investigated the possible malfunction of
intersegmental pathways following strok
Since incoordination of extensor muscles results in abnormal synergies
at the paretic lower limb, the questions then arise whether these spinal
mechanisms of regulation of soleus excitability by FN afferent 1) are modified
in hemiparetic subjects as compared to those of healthy subjects and if so, 2)
to what extent these malfunctions are related to leg motor impairment?
In this study, the integrity of the intersegmental pathways linking
quadriceps (Quads) to soleus (Sol) were explored in hemiparetic subjects and
compared to that of healthy control subjects. Moreover the possible
relationship between motor dysfunction at the paretic lower limb and changes in
the heteronymous spinal modulation were assessed.
2. METHODS
3. RESULTS
Within both
experimental groups, the contraction level of voluntary EMG activity (i.
In 40% of the control
subjects, a short-latency (26 ± 1ms) and short-duration (8 ± 2ms) facilitation
(25 ± 44% increase of baseline values) was observed after FN stimulation. In
all control subjects, the FN stimulation produced a marked inhibition (48 ± 22%
decrease of baseline values) of Sol voluntary EMG activity at a mean latency of
34 ± 4 ms and duration of 59 ± 34 ms.
A higher percentage
of the hemiparetic subjects (64%) showed the FN-induced facilitation. This
facilitation was also of greater amplitude (111 ± 99 %) compared to control
values (p = 0.016) but the latency (26 ± 3ms) and duration (13±7 ms)
characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. In
contrast to the control subjects, the majority of hemiparetic subjects did not
show the FN-induced inhibition at latencies corresponding to the pattern
observed in healthy subjects (cf. Figure 1). At both voluntary
contraction levels, baseline EMG activity of hemiparetic subjects were
correlated with the spasticity index (CSI) scores (r = -0.760; p = 0.007 at 20%
of Sol max EMG level and r = -0.836; p < 0.005 at 40% level) and also with
the motor performance (CMSA) scores at the leg (r = 0.81; p = 0.003 at 20%
level and r = 0.81; p = 0.009 at 40% level). Facilitation of Sol at short
latencies (within 22 and 34 ms post-stimulation) was correlated with CSI scores
at 20% (r = 0.88; p<0.001) and 40% (r = 0.66, p=0.038) contraction levels.
Facilitation was also correlated to CMSA scores at the foot (r = -0.651; p =
0.030) at 20% of max EMG at Sol.
In all healthy
subjects tested, stimulation of FN during the sustained isometric contraction
of Sol induced a clear depression of Sol voluntary EMG activity either at 20%
or 40% of maximal voluntary EMG activity levels. Mean results for healthy
subjects revealed a long-duration (59 ± 34 ms) and a marked decrease (from 40%
to 60%) of voluntary EMG activity at Sol at a latency of 34 ± 4 ms after FN
stimulation (cf. Figure 1). Hemiparetic subjects showed on
average no heteronymous inhibition at latencies (from 34 to 90 ms after
FN-stimulation) where the phenomenon was observed in control subjects at bith
level of contraction tested. Moreover, at 40% max EMG at Sol, the modulation of
Sol EMG activity from 48 ms to 61 ms after FN stimulation, which corresponds to
an inhibitory modulation period in control subjects, was correlated to the
degre of spasticity (CSI Ankle).
Figure
1 Mean modulation of Sol voluntary EMG activity induced by FN
conditioning stimulation for control (filled triangles) and hemiparetic
subjects (open circles) at comparable baseline values (ie, 20%.and 40%
of max EMG at Sol for control and hemiparetic subjects respectively).
The modulation of Sol integrated EMG activity was measured from 22 to 100 ms
after FN stimulation within 6 consecutive time windows (of 13 ms duration)
and was expressed as a % of the baseline EMG activity. Each symbol represents
the mean modulation of Sol EMG activity for each group within the time-window
of analysis (15 trials averaging per subject). Vertical bars represent 1 SEM.
Asteriks indicate statistically significant differences from the baseline EMG
activity (p < 0.05 *; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.001 ***). |
|
|
|
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The short-latency
modulation of Sol EMG activity by FN stimulation reveals strong intersegmental
influences of FN onto Sol motoneuronal pool (Meunier et al., 1990). The
consistent finding is a marked inhibition of Sol voluntary EMG activity
observed in all healthy subjects tested. A short-duration (8 ms)
facilitation may precede the heteronymous inhibition in 40% of the cases.
However, hemiparetic subjects show, on average, non-significant inhibition
after FN stimulation. The results suggest an alteration of this heteronymous
inhibition. On the contrary, facilitation was the
preponderant influence of FN afferents onto Sol voluntary EMG activity at
short-terms latencies.
Previous studies have
suggested that the short-latency facilitation of Sol is an heteronymous
monosynaptic excitation by group Ia afferents from FN whereas the consecutive
long-lasting inhibition results from recurrent inhibition projecting from FN to
Sol (Meunier et al., 1990; 1996). Our results suggest an overfacilitation of
the monosynaptic heteronymous excitation by Ia afferents pathways and a
dysfunction of heteronymous reccurent inhibition pathways from Quads to Sol in
hemiparesis. The dysfunction of both spinal mechanisms could have a significant
impact in the regulation of Quads and Sol activation and coordination.
In fact, dysfunction of some spinal mechanisms
is well documented in spastic hemiparesis. Our results confirm that these
dysfunctions usually result in a global facilitation of spinal pathways (Artieda
et al., 1991). The functional significance of these spinal mechanisms is still
to be established. The correlations analysis revealed that, in the hemiparetic
subjects, the amount of EMG activity that can be generated (i.
Intersegmental
inhibition of Sol EMG triggered by FN stimulation is modified in hemiparesis
following strok
References
[1]
Artieda J, Quesada P, Obeso JA. Reciprocal inhibition
between forearm muscles in spastic hemiplegia. Neurology, 286-9, 1991.
[2] Bourbonnais D, Vanden Noven S, Pelletier R. Incoordination in
patients with hemiparesis. Can J Public
Health, 83 Suppl 2: S58-63, 1992.
[3] Delwaide PJ, Oliver E. Short-latency autogenic inhibition (IB
inhibition) in human spasticity. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51: 1546-50.
[4] Forget R and Bourbonnais D. Inhibitory effets of femoral nerve
stimulation on voluntary contraction of soleus. Presented at the XII
Congress of ISEK (
[5] Katz R, Pierrot-Deseilligny E.
Recurrent inhibition of alpha-motoneurons in patients with upper motor neuron
lesions. Brain, 105: 103-24, 1982.
[6] Meunier S, Pierrot-Deseilligny E. Gating of the afferent volley of the monosynaptic stretch reflex during movement in man. J Physiol, 419: 753-63, 1989.
[7] Meunier S, Penicaud A,
Pierrot-Deseilligny E, Rossi A. Monosynaptic Ia excitation and recurrent
inhibition from quadriceps to ankle flexors and extensors in man. J Physiol, 423: 661-75.1990.
[8] Meunier S, Pierrot-Deseilligny E,
Simonetta M. Pattern of monosynaptic heteronymous Ia connections in the human
lower limb. Exp Brain Res, 96:
534-44, 1993.
[9] Meunier S, Mogyoros I, Kiernan MC,
Burke D. Effects of femoral nerve stimulation on the electromyogram and reflex
excitability of tibialis anterior and soleus. Muscle Nerve ,19: 1110-5, 1996.
[10] Yanagisawa N, Tanaka R, Ito Z. Reciprocal Ia inhibition in spastic hemiplegia of man. Brain, 99: 555-74, 1976.
Acknowledgements
J.O.D. was supported by the FCAR (FQRNT) and D.B and R.F. by FRSQ fellowships.