Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute
and
r.gorman@unsw.edu.au
Abdominal
muscles are the most important expiratory muscles in active expiration, such as
during coughing. Spinal cord injured patients may suffer respiratory
complications because of abdominal muscle paralysis and subsequent reduced
ability to cough. In 6 able-bodied subjects, we compared twitch pressures from
a single electrical pulse through surface electrodes, postero-laterally and
anteriorly on the torso to twitches from magnetic stimulation of nerve roots at
T10 level. A gastro-oesophageal catheter measured gastric pressure (PGa)
and oesophageal pressure (POes). Stimuli were delivered at
increasing intensity (to 450 mA) at functional residual capacity (FRC) in the
seated posture and at the maximal intensity at total lung capacity (TLC).
Twitch pressures were greatest with electrical stimulation postero-laterally
and magnetic stimulation at T10 and smallest at the anterior site (PGa,
30±3 and 33±6 cmH2O vs. 12±3 cmH2O; POes 8±2
and 11±3 cmH2O vs. 5±1 cmH2O;
mean±SEM). At TLC twitch pressures were generally larger. The values were
comparable to those evoked by magnetic stimulation. In 4 spinal cord injured
patients 1-s trains of 50Hz stimulation were superimposed on voluntary cough
efforts. Stimulation increased PGa by 217% and expiratory flow by
26% during cough efforts. The postero-lateral stimulation site was the optimal
site for generating gastric and oesophageal twitch pressures compared to the
anterior stimulation sit
During normal breathing, expiration is usually passive. However, the activity of expiratory muscles becomes crucial during increased ventilation, cough or expulsive manoeuvres. The abdominal muscles are the most important expiratory muscles for active expiration.
Patients
with spinal cord injury resulting in abdominal muscle paralysis have an
increased risk of respiratory complications because of their reduced ability to
cough [1]. Electrical or magnetic stimulation of the abdominal muscles has
the potential to improve the ability of these patients to cough and help clear
lung secretions [2,
3].
This study
was designed to determine the optimal site and method for electrical
stimulation of the abdominal muscles to generate abdominal and thoracic twitch
pressures. In patients with spinal cord injury, we also assessed the ability of
abdominal muscle stimulation to improve the effectiveness of their cough.
In 6 healthy able-bodied subjects, the twitch pressures produced by a single electrical pulse (monophasic, 200 μs width) through surface electrodes placed postero-laterally on the torso were compared to the twitch pressures produced by magnetic stimulation of the nerve roots at the level of T10 [e.g. 3] and electrical stimulation of the anterior surface of the torso as described in previous studies (Fig. 1) [e.g. 2].
Twitch pressures were recorded from a gastro oesophageal catheter with transducers in the stomach to record gastric pressure (PGa) and in the oesophagus to record oesophageal pressure (POes). Twitch pressures were recorded at increasing stimulus intensities (50-450 mA) at functional residual capacity (FRC) in the seated posture and at the maximal intensity at total lung capacity (TLC; Fig. 1).
In 4 male patients
with chronic spinal cord injury (level C3/C4, C4, C7/T1, T6), we recorded
twitch pressures at increasing stimulus intensities at FRC, as described above.
In addition, we recorded pressure and flow generated voluntarily during
attempted coughs (from TLC), during coughs with a superimposed 1-s, 50 Hz stimulus
train, and with the stimulus train only. Maximal expiratory pressures with and
without stimulation trains were also recorded. The stimulus current for the 1-s
trains was set for each patient to produce a similar gastric pressure as during
a voluntary cough (70-120 mA).

Figure 1. Schematic showing electrode placement positions for anterior, postero-lateral and magnetic stimulation.

In all cases, the highest twitch pressures were evoked by electrical stimulation postero-laterally and magnetic stimulation at T10 than at the anterior site (Table 1 and Figs. 2 and 3). At TLC twitch pressures were generally larger.

Figure 2. Representative twitch pressures (2 per site) from one subject (450mA at FRC). The pressures were similar for postero-lateral and magnetic stimulation, but were much smaller twitches for the anterior site.

Table 1. Mean peak twitch pressures at maximal stimulus
intensity (450 mA).
|
Stimulation site |
PGa cmH2O (mean ± SEM) |
POes cmH2O (mean ± SEM) |
|
Anterior |
12 ±
3* |
5 ± 1* |
|
Postero-lateral |
30 ±
3* |
8 ± 2*
|
|
Magnet
|
33 ±
6* |
11 ±
3* |
Maximal twitch
pressures in the spinal cord injured patients ranged from 18 to 28 cm H2O, similar to the able-bodied subjects. Peak PGa during maximal expiratory efforts was
increased from 30 cmH2O for voluntary efforts to 60 cmH2O for voluntary efforts with superimposed stimulation trains. During
cough efforts, peak PGa was increased
by 217% with the added stimulation train (see Fig. 4).
Peak flow rate during
cough was increased by 26% with superimposed stimulation and exhaled volume
during cough was increased by 87% (Fig. 4).
The postero-lateral stimulation site was the optimal site for generating gastric and oesophageal twitch pressures compared to the anterior stimulation site. The values were comparable to those evoked by magnetic stimulation.
Twitch pressures at TLC were larger than at FRC.
From TLC expiratory flows were largest using the postero-lateral electrode site.
In spinal cord injured patients, voluntary cough pressure, flow and volume can be significantly augmented by abdominal electrical stimulation.
[1] Jaeger RJ, Turba RM, Yarkony GM, Roth EJ. Cough in spinal cord injured patients: comparison of three methods to produce cough. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74: 1358-61, 1993.
[2] Linder SH. Functional electrical stimulation to enhance cough in quadriplegia. Chest, 103: 166-9, 1993.
[3] Polkey MI, Luo Y, Guleria R, Hamnegård CH, Green M, Moxham J. Functional magnetic stimulation of the abdominal muscles in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 160: 513-22, 1999.
Acknowledgements
Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and a NSW Premier’s grant.