HABITUATION OF VENTILATORY RESPONSE DURING FES OF ABDOMINAL MUSCLES IN NORMAL SUBJECTS

 

F Kandare1, U Stanič2, J Jeraj2, J Šorli1, and R J Jaeger3

 

1University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, 4204  Golnik, Slovenia - SI

2lnstitute Jožef Stefan, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia - SI

3Research Service, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Chicago, USA

 

ABSTRACT

In five normal subjects the effects of prolonged functional electrical stimulation (FES) of rectus abdominis (RA) muscles and lateral abdominal muscles (LA) on pulmonary ventilation was studied. The stimulation, provided by as custom-made four-channel electrical stimulator, was synchronized to normal expiration and delivered via self-adhesive electrodes. Individually adjusted intensity of stimulation generated substantial contractions, not exceeding the subject’s comfort.  In each subject the stimulation was performed according three protocols that varied in duration from 1.5 to 3 hours.

After an initial increase of pulmonary ventilation up to 90 % of the quiet breathing value in some subjects, it declined exponentially to a plateau value of about 30 % over the initial value.  The same behavior was observed with tidal volume, while the breathing rate after initial increase remained constant during stimulation. The effects of stimulation are similar between the groups of stimulated muscles and protocols used. Irrespective of the underlying mechanism(s) for these observations, the alternative mode of stimulation of different abdominal muscles (RA and LA muscles groups) could possibly offer better results during prolonged clinical applications.

Keywords: FES, abdominal muscles, pulmonary ventilation, normal subjects

 

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary ventilation is continuous cyclic process enabling adequate respiratory gas exchange from birth to death. If significant disturbances in this process occur, lifespan can be reduced.  Both invasive and noninvasive methods using different devices to overcome the periods of insufficient ventilation have been described [1,2]. All devices and systems are prepared for long-term use enabling adequate ventilation according to metabolic demands without significant harm to respiratory system. Previous experiments [3] with functional electrical stimulation of abdominal muscles showed, that significant augmentation of pulmonary ventilation was achieved in short-term experiments.  This method might be clinically applicable if the effects could be maintained for sufficiently long periods to fulfill clinical demands.

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-tem effects of functional electrical stimulation of abdominal muscles on pulmonary ventilation in neurologically intact subjects with average physical fitness.

 

METHODS

Subjects: Five neurologically intact subjects (one female and four males, avg. age 27 years) were tested.  The pulmonary function tests of all five subjects were within normal limits, the subjects had no current pulmonary complaints. The study was approved by National Ethic Committee of Republic of Slovenia and written informed consent was obtained  from each subject.

Evaluation of pulmonary function: Pulmonary ventilation and other metabolic parameters were measured breath by breath with an Oxycon Beta System (TripleV system for flow measurements, paramagnetic O2 analyzer, fast infrared CO2 analyzer) and average minute values were calculated. Maximal inspiratory and expiratory (MIP, MEP) pressures were measured with Pmax fi. Morgan.

Electrical stimulation: Stimulation of abdominal muscles were performed with a custom-made electrical stimulator [4] through surface self adhesive stimulating electrodes (PALS Axelgard, rectangular 5x 9 cm) placed on the abdominal wall. For rectus abdominis muscles stimulation, electrodes were placed just below costal margin and above syphysis bone near the median line. For stimulation lateral abdominal group of muscles (external and internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles), the electrodes were placed in vertical direction parallel to m. rectus abdominis muscle and in the lumbar region. Stimulation parameters were: 1 second pulse train at  45 Hz, amplitude of stimulation 50-70 mA, and pulse width 150 ms.  For each subject the initially selected amplitude was constant over all protocols.

Protocol: Experiments were performed in supine position using three different protocols.

1.      Ten minutes of quiet breathing, three hours of RA stimulation, ten minutes of quiet breathing

2.      Ten minutes of quiet breathing, followed with ten minutes of RA stimulation with progressive periods of quiet breathing from one to 5 minutes and corresponding shortening of stimulation time

3.      Same protocol as 2, with alternating stimulation of RA and LA to the level of 5 minute alternating RA/LA stimulation

Each protocol was performed on separate days in the same period of day from 1 to 5pm. Time between experiments was 1 week or more.

 

RESULTS


The mean values of ventilatory and other parameters during quiet breathing and period of 3 hours of  FES are shown in table 1. In Figure 1. time course of breathing rate and total

 

ventilation obtained during first protocol is shown. The breathing rate with an average increase of 3 breaths per minute, is nearly constant during FES, whereas ventilation, after peaking in the first 10 minutes, decline to a constant value due to tidal volume lowering. Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures before and after 3 hours of stimulation are not significantly different (MIP: 99±26 mm Hg / 104±38 mm Hg and MEP: 128±30 mm Hg /134±34 mm Hg respectively). The results of ventilation measurements versus cumulative time of stimulation for RA constructed from values obtained from all three protocols and LA from third protocol are shown on Figure 2. The values of total ventilation after the initial increase, decline in an exponential manner reaching a new basal level after approximately 20 minutes, irrespective of the various stimulating and non-stimulating periods in the different protocols. CO2 elimination showed the same pattern as ventilation reaching new basal value at the same time as ventilation did.


DISCUSSION

In normal subjects during quiet breathing, the abdominal muscles are usually not significantly involved in expiration although some observations have showed activity of these muscles during quiet breathing [5].  In the state of increased metabolic activity or increased respiratory load, as in COPD, these muscles do become activated during quiet breathing [6]. For maintaining adequate pulmonary ventilation stimulated muscles must have ability to repeatedly contract and relax over long periods of time.  In short-term experiments it has been proved that FES of abdominal muscles augments pulmonary ventilation due to tidal volume increase.

As is shown in the present experiments of three hours duration, after the initial increase, ventilation declined and in about 10 to 15 minutes reached a plateau which lasted until the end of the stimulation period. A similar pattern of decline in ventilation was observed when the stimulation was interrupted with periods of quiet breathing. There are more possible explanations of these observations. Rhythmic contractions as are performed during FES are not normally observed and are therefore unusual, producing the signs of stimulated muscular fatigue sooner as observed during physiologic activities and low-frequency fatigue of the muscle can be responsible for lowering of initial tidal volume increase. Similar observations were found after voluntary hyperventilation [7]. The unchanged maximal expiratory pressures after prolonged stimulation indicated that high frequency fatigue was not significantly involved.

The other possible explanation is the habituation to constant stimulation, but this is difficult to prove it. The subjects' report that their sensations of stimulation during the initial period are changed and they feel decreased intensity of stimulation lasted during residual part of experiment, although the amplitude of stimulation was constant. Another plausible explanation of the observations is lowered end-expiratory level (FRC) as a effect of FES of abdominal muscles and possibly consequently lowered activity of inspiratory muscles (diaphragm) or intervention of other regulatory mechanisms of ventilation which were responsible for lowering tidal volume to near basal values.  All of these possible mechanisms will be studied in future experiments.

Irrespective of the mechanisms involved for prolonged FES pulmonary ventilation, data of the present study support the alternative mode of stimulation of different abdominal muscles (RA and LA muscles groups) as possibly offer better results during prolonged application.

 

REFERENCES

 

[1] Tobin MJ.  Principles and Practice of Mechanical Ventilation.  McGraw Hill, St. Louis, 1994.

[2] Simons AK.  Non-invasive ventilatory support. Chapman & Hall Medical, London, 1966.

[3] Šorli J, F Kandare, RJ Jaeger, U Stanič.  Ventilatory assistance using electrical stimulation of abdominal muscles, IEEE Trans Rehab Engr. 1996;4:1-6.

[4] Jeraj J, U Stanič, F Kandare, J Jaeger. Four-channel stimulator for expiratory supported ventilation, 6th Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation, September, 1998, 239-242.

[5] Abe T, N Kusuhara, N Yoshimura, T Tomita, PA Easton. Differential respiratory activity of four abdominal muscles in humans. J Appl Physiol 1996;80:1379-83.

[6] Morris MJ, RG Magdwick, AJ Frew, DJ Lane. Breathing muscle activity during expiration in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. Eur Respir J 1990;3:901-9.

[7] Kyroussis D et al. Abdominal muscle fatigue after maximal ventilation in humans. J Appl Physiol 1996;81:1477-83.