CLOSED-LOOP
IN PATIENTS WITH FOOT DROP
Seung Kwan Lim1, Ho Choon Jeong1, Sang Se Lee1
Dal Bok Jin1, Moon Yong Lee2, Byung Rim Park2
1Faculty of
Electronic Engineering,
2Department of
Physiology,
Iksan 570-749,
ABSTRACT
A portable and convenient closed-loop
controlled electrical stimulator has been developed for patients with foot drop
caused by CNS injury. The system was composed of optical sensor for detecting
joint angle, programmed stimulator for
Key words: foot
drop, closed-loop
INTRODUCTION
In recent years there has been increasing
interest in the utilization of functional electrical stimulation (FES) for
restoring motor function in the paralyzed extremities caused by central motor
neuron disorders.1) Portable systems have been used for restoration
of gait function in patients with foot drop caused by stroke, which are
controlled by open-loop system. The open-loop controlled system has less
effective for preventing foot drop since electrode impedance and muscle fatigue
increase by stimulation for long time. Therefore, stimulus intensity should be
increased in proportion to increased impedance and fatigue in order to prevent
from foot drop during walking. In this study
METHODS
Closed-loop controlled system is composed of
microprocessor, high voltage generator, surface electrode, and display. Period
of stimulation is determined by detection of swing and stance phases by
pressure sensor, and ankle joint angle is identified by optical sensor. Ankle
joint angle is controlled by stimulus intensity which is regulated by D/A
converter in PID system. The output signal from microcontroller is applied to
the common peroneal nerve through surface electrode in order to prevent from
foot drop. Eight healthy adults (5 male and 3 female; average age 29.7 ys) and
5 hemiparetic patients were examined. To determine an optimal stimulus
parameter electrical stimulations with pulse width modulation at range of 0.1 -
0.5 ms and with frequency modulation at range of 20 - 50 Hz were applied to the
common peroneal nerve through surface electrodes in healthy subject. In
hemiparesis patients electrical stimulation with 0.2 ms, 40 Hz was applied to
the common peroneal nerve for 40 days.
RESULTS
1. Optimal
parameter of electrical stimulation
To determine the optimal pulse width at
frequency of 40 Hz, moment at ankle joint was measured for 100 sec when
electrical stimulation with pulse width of 0.1 - 0.5 ms was applied to the
common peroneal nerve through surface electrode in healthy subjects.
Eelectrical stimulation at 0.2 ms
produced relatively strong
tension among other pulse widths. When electrical stimulation with
frequency of 20 - 50 Hz at 0.2 ms was applied to the common peroneal nerve for
100 sec, 40 Hz maintained relatively strong tension. Therefore, optimal
parameter for electrical stimulation was
determined as pulse width of 0.2 ms and
frequency of 40 Hz in this study (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Time-dependent changes on tension of ankle dorsiflexors by
stimulation
of the common peroneal nerve in healthy subjects.
2. Modulation of
stimulus intensity resulting from change of the ankle joint angle
In open-loop controlled system, stimulus
intensity was sustained constantly even though the joint angle was changed at
range of 0 to 60 degrees. However, closed-loop controlled system modulated
stimulus intensity automatically depending on changes of the joint angle by PID
program. Stimulus intensity was more increased to maintain the preset level
when the joint angle was far from the preset level, and the intensity was
decreased if the joint angle was close to the preset level.
3. Effect of
electrical stimulation on moment of the ankle joint
The moment by TES in 5 hemiparetic patients
was increased gradually with time, especially the effect was more prominent in
younger patient group. The muscle force was increased up to 29.7% 6 weeks after
stimulation in 5 patients. Also, muscle fatigue was decreased compared with the
level before stimulation. When the closed-loop controlled system was applied to
the patients, gait function was improved (Fig. 2).
![]()

Days
Fig. 2. Time-dependent changes on tension of ankle dorsiflexors by TES
in 5 hemiparetic patients.
DISCUSSION
The optimal parameter for electrical
stimulation was reported that 0.2 ms, 20 Hz in slow muscles and 0.3 ms, 40 Hz
in fast muscles.2) Considering the muscles for ankle dorsiflexion
were composed of slow and fast muscles, 0.2 ms and 40 Hz would be acceptable as
an optimal stimulus parameter of the common peroneal nerve through surface
electrodes. Open-loop controlled FES has several problems, such as the patients
can not control their gait velocity and joint angle when the degree of ankle
dorsiflexion is decreased due to increased impedance of electrodes. But
closed-loop controlled FES including PID, pressure sensor and optical sensor
can modulate gait velocity and stimulus intensity to maintain the preset level
of the joint angle. Chronic electrical stimulation of the paralyzed muscles
increased muscle force and decreased muscle fatigue gradually with time. These
improvements by electrical stimulation may result from electrical effect, which
increases metabolism by changing from anaerobic into aerobic metabolism,
increasing blood flow, oxygen consumption, and glucose consumption. Especially,
decrease of muscle fatigue by electrical stimulation results from decreased
production of lactic acid in addition to the previous explanations.3)
(Supported by
ITEP 1996)
REFERENCES
1. Handa Y, Hoshimiya N: Functional electrical stimulation for the control of the upper extremities. Med Prog Tech 12: 51-63, 1987
2. Park BR, Cho JS, Kim MS, Chun SW: Effects of intermittent sciatic nerve stimulation on the soleus and medial gastrocnemius muscle atrophy in hindlimb suspended rats. Kor J Physiol 26: 159-166, 1992
3. Altman TJ, Hudlicka O, Tyler KR: Long term effects of tetanic
stimulation on blood flow, metabolism, and performance of fast skeletal muscle.
J Physiol 296: 36-50, 1979